Some Reassuring News Out of Afghanistan?

In my last post I referenced the Washington Post article that reports of an increasingly desperate Afghan government “mull”ing about arming tribal militia in the south of the country in order to combat the Taliban. It is needless to rehash here again that such policies would be tentamount to repeating a disastrous experiment that threw Afghanistan into chaos in the 1990s as an increasingly desperate (foreign-backed) government then also resorted to arming the tribal militia. To cite a more contemporary case in point, take the example of Iraq where militia forces attached to one or the other political party have engaged in human rights abuses and sectarian violence.

In light of all this, the recent news out of Afghanistan about the government sanctioning the formation of tribal militia had really pre-occupied my mind. In fact, when an occasion arose today to ask about this from a well-placed source in the Afghan government (whose identity I cannot disclose without giving away my own too) I nearly jumped out of my seat at the end of the presentation and asked what the deal was with the government arming the militia.

I was glad to hear the speaker’s reassuring answer that all of this was the media’s usual misrepresentation of events in Afghanistan and that the government was in no way planning to arm the tribal militia. What the government is considering instead is to seek the help of villagers in defending southern provinces from the Taliban, and form squads in various locales in the south that would work closely with the local police forces to defend against the Taliban.

Great. So that’s what the big hoopla was all about?
I am just baffled by how the media can twist things around so much.


3 Responses to Some Reassuring News Out of Afghanistan?

  1. Q. A. Shah says:

    That was what I had read too, in the headlines/article i just recently posted about. What confuses me there, and here w/ your post is how those two statements don’t negate each other.

    This is likely my naivete and misunderstanding of this region though. Yet, I don’t see how forming armed groups in specific towns isn’t tantamount to forming tribal militias. Especially (if my understanding is corrrect) given that the villages will likely be of one tribal or ethnic alliance, and often patrons to one regional commander/leader/warlord.

    How do you see the two, arming squads of villager vs. forming tribal militias, as being different?

  2. hamesha: says:

    This is not the first time I have failed miserably in gettig across my sarcasm. I guess I would have to try harder.
    You are right, the official denied the news at the same time as explaining how the government would go about forming the militia.
    Hope all is well with you there in Kabul.

  3. Q. A. Shah says:

    It’s more likely my self-righteous earnestness. Or thick-headedness. Now that I skim it again, and especially your final two sentences, blame my ineptitude.

    All is well here, thanks. Enjoy D.C. and the metro commute, I’m missing it these days.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: