The Military-Intellectual Complex

In April of 2003, shortly after the invasion of Iraq, Adam Shatz of The Nation wrote a article portraying the prominent Arab-American intellectual Fouad Ajami as a “native informant.” Shatz wrote:

“…(Ajami’s) once-luminous writing, increasingly a blend of Naipaulean clichés about Muslim pathologies and Churchillian rhetoric about the burdens of empire, is saturated with hostility toward Sunni Arabs in general (save for pro-Western Gulf Arabs, toward whom he is notably indulgent), and to Palestinians in particular. He invites comparison with Henry Kissinger, another émigré intellectual to achieve extraordinary prominence as a champion of American empire…”

And underlining Ajami’s role in advocating for the invasion, “If Hollywood ever makes a film about Gulf War II, a supporting role should be reserved for Ajami…” (Read Shatz’s The Native Informant)

More recently, as the air is abuzz with word of possible ‘action’ against Iran, Hamid Dabashi of Columbia University accuses fellow Iranian intellectual in exile and author of the bestselling Reading Lolita in Tehran of serving a similar capacity in America’s designs against Iran.

According to Boston Globe’s Christopher Shea who quotes Dabashi’s “vituperative attack” on Nafisi in Al-Ahram, Dabashi writes:

“Rarely has an Oriental servant of a white-identified, imperial design, managed to pack so many services to imperial hubris abroad and racist elitism at home—all in one act.” (Read Shea’s Book Clubbed)

Yours truly has not the credentials to opine on the authenticity of the accusations against either of these luminaries, and ideally should not pretend to do so. But he can’t help himself. So here it goes.

I have long been of the opinion that just as Ike had warned about the predisposition to warmaking that is inherent in the collusion of industry, technology, and the military (the so-called “military-industrial complex”), there is an unholy matrimony of sorts between scholarship and empire-building in our times. Call it the military-intellectual complex -or even better, the hidden pun that lies in the name “think-tank,” and that might as well be extended to “think-shoot” and “think-invade.” In fact, as the late Edward Said argued nearly three decades ago in his immortal work Orientalism, the nexus of knowledge and power extends as far back as empire itself. Still one can make the argument that the relationship is especially cozy in these times.

Cast in this light, one cannot help but wonder how big a role Ajami and Nafisi may have played (wittingly or otherwise) in engineering the war plans. And frankly, both of these people look just too good and pampered on TV, and for me that is always cause for suspicion.

Now here is something that will really bake your noodle: who do you think fits the profile of the “native informant” in the case of the war in Afghanistan? And don’t say it’s Zalmay Khalilzad. He fits another profile -that of the “reluctant warrior”- in the US overthrow of the Taliban in 2001, and he is scarcely “native.”

One last observation:

Ajami and Nafisi both happen to teach at Johns Hopkins University’s School of Advanced International Studies. Hmmm… how intriguing.  Wonder if I (willing as I am at this point to sell my soul for admission to a PhD program with a full ride) should maybe drop by for some peptalk.


3 Responses to The Military-Intellectual Complex

  1. sakhidad hatif says:

    always brilliant…
    i am proud of my biraar,
    i chant.

  2. SE says:

    Have humans ever done anything in an intellectual vaccum? And isn’t it the case that without much merit every generation thinks their predicament the worst?

    Actually this controversary has been brewing for months now. I read Dabashi’s piece in Al Ahram Weekly, and thought him quite uncharitable.

    I don’t think it “baking my noodles” to find “native informants” in Afghanistan. Over 300 years someone has been doing someone’s bidding in Afghanistan in one form or another.

    This is also a bit restrictive. Could you please delineate what is exactly “Western” and “imperialist” and what is not. Chopping hands? Wearing pants? Using soap bar? Wearing knickers? Toilet paper?

    Color me “native informant” then, I fully endorse using fragrant soap, toilet paper and wearing knickers. Something that every Western imperialist tend to advocate. Ah, the calamity!

  3. Borat says:

    Talk about informants:

    Fouad Ajami, who has written for TNR for nearly 25 years, was awarded the National Humanities Medal by President Bush last week. It is an award any president would–and should–have made. If the American people at all better understand the subtleties of the Arab and Muslim worlds, it is largely because his mind has made its mark on our minds.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: