Europe’s Irrelevance, Not NATO’s Failure

As was expected, President Bush’s entreaties to the NATO members to enlarge their military footprints in Afghanistan (and to remove some of the rediculous limitations on their mandates) fell on deaf ears. Save for the over-enthusiastic new enlistees (read Estonia) most other senior members of the pact refused to increase troops or widen their mandate. Some have already billed this as “NATO’s failure in Afghanistan.”

As has been pointed out time and again, failure is not an option in Afghanistan. The historical experience of disengaging from and essentially failing Afghanistan in the 1990s would say the same thing. Afghanistan should not, can not, be written off easily as a failure. There will be far-reaching consequences. The United States understands this, and therefore, even if on a solo basis, will continue the mission in Afghanistan until such a time when the country can man its own security. Needless to say, this means a long time in Afghanistan.

While the outcomes of the Riga summit is certainly bad news for Afghanistan, it need not be a failure. Instead, it show’s NATO’s irrelevance to Afghanistan. More generally, it shows Europe’s irrelevance to today’s important global security issues. The Riga summit was an important test of Europe’s role in today’s world. Ever so persistent on multilateralism, especially in their vocal denunciation of US’s unilateral invasion of Iraq, the Europeans failed to live up their own standards in Afghanistan. Afghanistan was the testing ground for Europe’s honesty about their rhetoric of multilateralism, and all indications seem to point to the direction of a profound hypocrisy.

The truth is that the Europeans are a little ahead of their times -a little more advanced than the rest of us. As Robert Kagan argues in his book Of Paradise and Power, given Europe’s sour experiences with the two World Wars, they have decidedly moved beyond the era of militarism and the use of military power as a political tool. Which is all grand and beautiful, and may finally have succeeded in harnessing the inherent German tendency for expansionism, but it does not apply to the rest of the world. The backwaters of civilization (Europeans can only view them as such) like the Middle East and troubled spots in Asia do not conform to this high-minded model of “perpetual peace.”

Which brings us to this: the United States should stop wasting its breath trying to encourage the Europeans to do something which they are all but existentially incapable of doing. It should own up to its important historical role and the responsibilities of a global leader and a hyper-power. In turn, the Europeans should stop wasting their breath trying to stop the United States from playing the role that it must play in today’s world. At times, the fulfillment of this role requires unilateral action, and the Europeans should resign themselves to that fact. Meanwhile, they should continue their positive contribution in terms of aid, reconstruction, and peacebuilding -as they are doing in Afghanistan.

Advertisements

7 Responses to Europe’s Irrelevance, Not NATO’s Failure

  1. The European refusal can be potentially read as:

    1. Punishing Bush for his adventures in Iraq.
    2. Khalilzad won little support by sidelining European concerns when the current political framework was being laid down in Afghanistan (they wanted more emphasis on human rights and were seeking to limit the role of the warlords, but Khalilzad pushed his own agenda with emphasis on short-term stability).

    Given 1 and 2, one can understand Europe’s reticence. Also, lets stop kidding ourselves, only the US can base and sustain the number of troops required to maintain a modicum of security in trouble spots in the south. Having one platoon each from say Romania, Czech Republic and the Netherlands isn’t terribly helpful to the cause. So whether the US wants it or not, they will have to shoulder the burden.

  2. hatif says:

    dear hamisha,
    I think you are advising too much a pragmatist approach to overcome the multi-layered deadlock that we currently see in and around AFghanistan’s progress. you have aptly pointed to Europe as being ahead of its time, and that means that it can no longer afford supporting fake embodiments of a military backed exported democracy. Europeans have decided that this mess in Afghanistan will remain there one way or another (with ups and downs ) and therefore it is against common sense to believe that Afghanistan crisis is being the most important challenge before the world. It is not. in the War of Capabilities, afghanistan will ultimately lose its importance even for terrorists and the exaggerations about its vital role in the world will deminish. It is true that Khalilzad prevented afghanistan from beginning an era of long-term transformation. His initiatives were in line with the policy of short-term defeat of the socalled Taliban leading to long-term comeback for a tribal power monopoly. Europe knows this.

  3. […] Afghan Warrior discusses the recent NATO summit and how it impacts Afghanistan. Safrang has additional comment, saying that the outcome of the summit is bad news, but need not be a failure, for Afghanistan. Nathan Hamm […]

  4. Helo, it is very interesting site. If You want you can visit mine. online continental airline I have make it myself. There you can find all about airlines, cheap airfares etc…

  5. AllForYou123 says:

    Helo, it is very interesting site. If You want you can visit mine. low rider oldies I have make it myself. There you can find all about low rider oldies etc…

  6. Protourdy says:

    Neat information! Hope to definitely come back again..

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: