Fallout From Ajmal Naqshbandi’s Death

Ajmal Naqshbandi

Reaction

In the days and hours since the tragic death of Afghan journalist Ajmal Naqshbandi at the hands of his Taliban captors, there has been a flurry of reactions and condemnations from various corners. Most of these came from within Afghanistan and from a few vanguards of the journalistic guild in the outside world. The only other ‘outside world’ reaction that I am aware of came in the form of a long and anguished series of emails from the Afghan Fulbright students in the US who were also intent, as of this writing, to raise their concerns to officials in the Afghan government. For much of the rest of the world, the hostage saga was over with the safe return of Italian journalist Daniel Mastrogiacomo and the story’s newsworthiness receded abruptly.

Most of the condemnations are justly directed against the Taliban and their heinous murder of an innocent human being, a recently married young man expecting to be a father soon, and an enterprising Afghan journalist. The criticisms, however, do not stop at the Taliban.

The Afghan government has also received an unusual amount of criticism for its alleged mishandling of the situation. Many have taken it for granted that the government of Afghanistan had the capability and wherewithal to handle the situation better, and to bring about the desired outcome, i.e. the hostage’s safety and release. They see it as a sign of the government’s lack of political will, or its outright carelessness with the lives of its own citizens that Ajmal was murdered. Most of such vituperations do not fail to point out that the government went to extraordinary lengths to arrange the safe release of Ajmal’s colleague the Italian journalist Daniel Mastrogiacomo in return for the release from captivity of five high ranking Taliban.

This blog has not shied away from pointing out some of the Afghan government’s serious shortcomings. However, in keeping with the blog’s longstanding tradition of going against the grain and the prevalent mob mentality, we will try to dissect some of the criticisms hurled at the government and try to follow that old mantra in journalism (that I hope also applies to the pseudojournalism that is blogging) to “Follow the Money.” In other words, let’s try to figure out who benefits from Ajmal’s death the most, and maybe we can see that the government is not to blame so much for Ajmal’s death on the political will and caring-for-Afghan-lives grounds as it is on grounds of competency.

Following the Money Trail

Two groups benefit the most from the fallout from Ajmal’s death. The first are those who perpetrated the action with the precise calculation and expectation that such a fallout will ensue. For some time now the Taliban have shown that they are not the brash and blunt Taliban of yesteryear. They understand well from their experience at the helm of the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan that bad PR can be a costly thing, and that images of people hanging from posts and women beaten by black-clad bearded youth can invigorate pressure groups and lead to big changes. They are a media-savvy group with a keen understanding of the power of images, sound bites, pictures, YouTube, in short, the power of perceptions. They understand that a democratic government, or even one that purports to democracy and safeguarding civil liberties, is beholden to certain constraints and vulnerabilities when it comes to dealing with these perceptions.

It is against this background that the Mastrogiacomo/Naqshbandi hostage crisis was staged by the Taliban. Their release of the Italian journalist not only secured them five of the highest ranking Taliban prisoners held by the Afghan government (including the brother of Mullah Dadullah, the de facto face of the Taliban to the world in recent times), but also set the stage for the gruesome sequel. The government of Afghanistan maintains to this day that Ajmal’s release was part of the exchange deal and that the Taliban broke their word and made new demands. Even so, the Ministry of Information and Culture has stated that it was surprised by the news of Ajmal’s death because at the time negotiations were underway to secure another deadline and buy more time. While none of this should be taken at face value, it is easy to see the Taliban’s motive for defaulting. This was evident from the Taliban spokesperson’s framing of their action as a response to the government’s not heeding the deadline and the demands made by the Taliban. One wonders whether even after the government had buckled under their demands for a second time and released more prisoners the Taliban would have stood by their words. After all, the Taliban had already secured the objective of portraying the government as weak and kowtowing – why not also show that it does not care about the lives of its own citizens as much as it does about foreigners. In retrospect, with accusations of “Khud Kush-i Bigana Parast” (self-hating, foreign-worshiping) coming from all corners, it seems the Taliban have succeeded in this objective as well.

Another group that could potentially exploit and benefit from the situation is the political opposition to the government that has in recent times crystallized in the form of an alliance so surreal that can only take shape in the context of Afghanistan (see here and here). In the days after Mastrogiacomo’s release and shortly before Ajmal’s murder by the Taliban, leaders of the newly formed UNF exploited the situation to fullest extent by stating that they would do more to secure Ajmal’s release and safe return, and that they would be willing to go to lengths that this government has not been able to in order to negotiate with the Taliban and curb violence. Employing demagoguery and the rhetoric of nationalism that so permeates the political discourse in Afghanistan, the new group harped on familiar strings citing the value of Afghan lives and its precedence over those of foreigners. It is clear that this tragic outcome, and the political fallout from it are open to spin and interpretation by some of the same people as signs of this government’s failure and the need for change.

The one constituency that stands to lose a great deal from Ajmal’s death, second in line of course to Ajmal himself and his family and circle of friends, is the government of Afghanistan. Even seen from the most cynical of points of view, the Afghan government would have done anything in its power, including another prisoner swap, to secure Ajmal’s release. This is why allegations of lack of political well and carelessness with Afghan lives simply do not stick in this case. Lack of competency, however, is another story. Hostage negotiations are notoriously difficult in all circumstances, including circumstances where the adversary is far more human and far less bloodthirsty than the Taliban. There are no shortage of incidents around the world where capable hostage negotiation teams have failed and many a hostage crisis has ended up ugly. It should come as no surprise then that with lack of capacity so endemic across all sectors of the Afghan government, their hostage negotiation team was not better prepared to deal with this situation.

Amjal’s death was a tragic loss of life and a major setback for the press in Afghanistan. He will be sorely missed by his young family, his many friends, and so many other people whose lives he had touched and was yet to touch in his young career. Out of reverence to him and the profession that he devoted his life to, and to its highest standards for truth, it only behoves the the rest of us to cultivate within ourselves more skepticism instead of cynicism.

Update

Further evidence of the political fallout from Ajmal Naqshbandi’s death: the New York Times reports that the Italian government of Romano Prodi has come under fresh attacks from the opposition accusing it of not doing enough to secure the release of Daniel Mastrogiacomo’s Afghan translator (Ajmal Naqshbandi) and calling on him to resign. Prodi in turn has accused the opposition of using Ajmal’s death for political gain.

Advertisements

29 Responses to Fallout From Ajmal Naqshbandi’s Death

  1. Matt Weems says:

    Insinuating that the United Front contributed to this man’s death makes little sense to me. Maybe instead of “follow the money” you could try “Occam’s razor.” An Amjal is not worth 1,800 western trained soldiers to the government, so they were not willing to go as far in obtaining his release. And – the Taliban do not with to energize western hatred of them by grizzly murders of western journalists. But they are using fear as a tool to intimidate Afghans. So they trade the Italian and kill the Afghans.

  2. J.Z. says:

    Matt,

    Thanks for your comment here, and to my earlier post about Warlord Coasters. I will reply to your points there in a separate post.

    I did not say that the UNF contributed to Ajmal’s death. Of course we can derive all sorts of insinuations from what others say, but what I actually said remains in its unedited form and can be read above.

    The UNF does not have to contribute to Ajmal’s death in order to stand to benefit from it politically. The UNF has no hand in the Taliban insurgency, yet with every passing day and every new suiciding bombing, their criticism of the government’s failure to curb the insurgency falls on more receptive ears. One of the leaders of the new front recently said in a statement that it would do more to secure Ajmal’s release. I have pointed this out in the article and will post a link to it as soon as I find an English language story with the quote.

    In addition to what you have suggested about the Taliban’s reason for not killing the western journalist, it can also be true that the Taliban got what they asked for in the prisoner exchange (and knowing the kind of pressures the Italian government and by extension the Afghan government were under, they were a tough bargain and asked for a lot.) It is also likely that more avenues than the risking of 1800 western trained soldiers was available to the Afghan government, but the Taliban were in control of the situation and made sure that it played out the way it did, for the reasons stated above.

  3. hatif says:

    dear Javaid,
    i enjoyed reading your analysis of the Taliban’s crime and its effects and implications for different parties.
    Karzai himself made it clear recently that he was negotiating with the taliban over some important issues. I don’t know wether it was part of his talks with the Taliban to release some of their top people from the government’s prisons and the Italian journalist just came in from the heaven to save the face of the government at a smaller expense on Karzai’s side. so taking up one frame of analysis may lead us to the lack-of-will or incompetency path, while a different frame ( the government’s willingness to work with the Taliban over the course of the coming years) may change the whole picture. You may have not forgotten the way this government went with disarming process around the country. In many areas in the south the government even armed militia instead of disarming them. this government is competent and willing where competency and strong will serve its purposes.
    i agree with you ,given that your point of departure is genuinely defendable, that the goverment is the loser according to your frame of analysis. but what if releasing the Taliban’s prisoners is the policy and not a forced mistake?

  4. Matt Weems says:

    Felt supposedly told Woodward to “Follow the money” to connect the crime to the people behind it. So when you say the United Front benefits under the heading “Follow the money trail” you insinuate they were somehow connected to his death.

  5. […] analyzes the ways in which the government of Afghanistan is and is not responsible for the death of Ajmal Naqshbandi. Share […]

  6. You can find lots of local reaction to Ajmal’s death online at AfghanWire, actually.

  7. sara says:

    hay the way that they killed Ajmal Naqshbandi is very sad. the afghan gov. cares about his dead body the way his father was cring marg bar karzay. the afghan gov should die. ok

  8. […] Tale of Two Journalists” Gregory Warner writes for Slate explaining why the release of Daniele Mastrogiacomo and the subsequent death of Ajmal Naqshbandi played into […]

  9. […] two newspaper editors were sacked, sentenced, and subsequently forced to flee or exiled. The tragic death of Ajmal Naqshbandi was the latest in a long string of abductions and executions of journalists by […]

  10. variable transformer wiring

    100 million in 2000, buying wager on the rights for usd$65 million in june 2005. Licensed by hasbro consumer products. The toy of variable transformer wiring itself is also deeply admissible. Trailer this wednesday !

  11. Juliana Lang says:

    You have done it once again. Great writing!

  12. Franchesca says:

    I feel that is one of the such a lot important information for me. And i’m glad studying your article. However wanna remark on few basic issues, The web site ( Franchesca – http://www.iamsport.org/pg/bookmarks/sweetspastor5/read/26178644/good-advice-for-better-dental-health-and-hygiene ) style is wonderful, the articles is in point of fact great : D. Good process, cheers

  13. Tamera says:

    That is really attention-grabbing, You’re a very skilled blogger. I’ve joined your rss feed and look ahead to looking for more of your wonderful post. Also, I’ve shared your site in my social networks

    My web-site; webpage, Tamera – http://www.4shared.com/office/IA1iLb9oce/Too_Much_Teeth_Whitening_Can_C.html ,

  14. Eunice says:

    What a stuff of un-ambiguity and preserveness of precious know-how about unpredicted emotions.

    My web page … site – Eunice – http://www.gaiaonline.com/journal/?mode=view&post_id=34898439&u=37166303 ,

  15. Lorraine says:

    I like the valuable info you provide in your articles. I will bookmark your weblog and check again here regularly. I’m quite sure I’ll learn many new stuff right here! Good luck for the next!

    my web-site – website ( Lorraine – https://delicious.com/knowingcontract16 )

  16. Carrol says:

    What’s up, just wanted to mention, I enjoyed this blog post. It was funny. Keep on posting!

    Here is my homepage :: web site ( Carrol – http://url.org/bookmarks/tamebackpack1790 )

  17. Marsha says:

    Hi there, You have done an incredible job. I’ll definitely digg it and personally recommend to my friends. I am sure they will be benefited from this web site.

    my homepage webpage ( Marsha – http://friendfeed.com/HughCoffeyy )

  18. Anderson says:

    My relatives every time say that I am killing my time here at web, except I know I am getting familiarity everyday by reading such good content.

    My web blog – web site – Anderson – http://friendfeed.com/DennisCaseye

  19. Jimmy says:

    Hello, i believe that i noticed you visited my website thus i got here
    to return the choose?.I am trying to in finding issues to improve
    my website!I guess its adequate to make use of a few of your concepts!!

  20. Verona says:

    I go to see every day some websites and blogs to
    read content, however this webpage offers feature based content.

  21. Myrtis says:

    I do agree with all of the ideas you have offered for your post.
    They’re very convincing and can certainly work. Nonetheless, the posts are
    very brief for novices. May just you please extend them a bit from
    subsequent time? Thanks for the post.

  22. Michele says:

    Thank you for any other informative website.
    The place else could I get that kind of info
    written in such a perfect method? I’ve a project that I’m just now operating on, and I’ve been on the
    look out for such information.

  23. Miriam says:

    I was curious if you ever considered changing the page layout of your blog?

    Its very well written; I love what youve got
    to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could
    connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having
    one or 2 pictures. Maybe you could space it out better?

  24. Shenna says:

    Hi everyone, it’s my first go to see at this
    website, and post is really fruitful for me, keep up posting these types of content.

  25. Viola says:

    I got this site from my friend who told me on the topic of this
    site and now this time I am browsing this site
    and reading very informative articles or reviews at this place.

  26. Candy says:

    I have been exploring for a bit for any high quality articles or weblog
    posts on this kind of space . Exploring in Yahoo I at last stumbled
    upon this website. Reading this information So i’m happy to show that I’ve a very good uncanny feeling I discovered exactly what I needed.

    I most surely will make certain to don?t put out of your mind this website
    and give it a glance regularly.

  27. Melvin says:

    I’ve been surfing online more than three hours today,
    yet I never found any interesting article like
    yours. It is pretty worth enough for me. Personally, if all site
    owners and bloggers made good content as you did, the web will be much more useful than ever before.

  28. Hi there to all, how is all, I think every one is getting more from this web page, and your
    views are pleasant in favor of new people.

  29. Katherine says:

    Hi outstanding website! Does running a blog such as this take a massive amount
    work? I’ve no knowledge of programming however I had been hoping
    to start my own blog soon. Anyway, if you have any suggestions or tips for new blog owners please
    share. I know this is off subject however I simply needed to ask.
    Appreciate it!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: